Will Trump 2.0 Make the Republic a Brave New World?

The elevation of Donald J. Trump to the presidency—for the second time—is both absurd and obscene. Absurd, for the very presence of this cartoonish jokester, which is a sick parody of the low-brow culture that he personifies. It is as if Marshal Mcluen’s dictum that the media is the message got processed through Neil Postman’s classic, Amusing Ourselves to Death in the elevation of an utterly uncouth TV reality host to the highest political position in the land. Interpreted through Postman’s lens, Trump’s appeal to the lowest common denominator among those who are inclined to be persuaded by right wing media outlets, is a structural phenomenon that uncannily mimics the absurdities of a constitutional republic which has been corrupted by the multitude of forces that push the nation in the opposite direction. In short, it is absurd to the nth degree that this ridiculous individual, and his group of election denying cronies that he is promoting to the uppermost offices in the land, will be placed in positions of the highest authority for the singular purpose of enacting his nihilistic agenda. As the years will inevitably grind on, unless something fundamentally changes, the joke will be on the collective us.

 More fundamentally, it is the obscene nature of what Trump—the exact counter-image of our founding president, George Washington—is likely to foist on this nation over the next four years that is the more troubling matter. At the core of this burden for us all is his mendacious corruption and criminality, which seems on track to debase our body politic and broader national discourse. Whatever else one may say, it is a fact that more voters than not opted for a convicted felon, to say nothing of the several indictments with which he was charged, two of which were aimed at his nihilistic effort to overturn the 2020 presidential race by both legal and not so legal means. That is, Trump sought to remain in power in 2020 even as the voters determined otherwise, while often resorting to illegal and morally dubious means of doing so, the republic be damned. 

 Trump’s claim that the Democrats “stole” the election built on a conspiratorial mindset that has been a hallmark to his approach to politics since his “birther” insinuations that Obama was born in Kenya and, therefore, was not legally serving as president.  That he has persuaded half of the voting public and those he nominates to high office to accept this stolen election lie is to transfer his own malignant narcissism to the collective us so that his private psychopathology becomes permeated throughout the public square. The price of this for We the People is incalculable. As we move to the implementation of policy under his administration, the collective impact of Trump’s corruption, criminality, lies, bigotry, and general ignorance of what high quality government consists of, will likely have a profoundly negative impact on the body politic and the broader health of the nation, the extent to which is difficult yet to calculate.

 The only hope for the U.S. is that he finds a way of fulfilling his fantasies by governing through more constructive frames of reference that translate into tangible accomplishments as this nation moves through the third decade of the 21st century. That would require a transformational mindset of an order of magnitude difficult to fathom, which, hope against hope, is the only chance we have of coming out of this administration relatively unscathed, at worst, and with substantial achievements at best, which I would be more than happy to acknowledge if they do materialize.

Shortly after the closing of the Constitutional Convention of 1787, Benjamin Franklin was asked whether the founders created a monarchy or a republic. “A republic,” the sage responded, “if you can keep it.” As an ongoing experiment in constitutional governance, we are about to find out whether a republic, in any meaningful sense, will endure during the next four years, or whether the United States of America will increasingly move toward the pathway of “illiberal democracy” that one of Trump’s role models, Hungarian Prime Minister, Victor Orban, has implemented over the past decade.

 There is no inevitable arc of history bending upward toward greater democratization and a great deal of actual history pointing toward increasing authoritarianism throughout the world, including the United States. To riff off Sinclair Lewis’s novel about the rise of fascism in the United States, It Can’t Happen Here, I contend that it most emphatically can happen here, and very well may be occurring in our very presence.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Character Matters

Comprehensive Immigration Policy Needed

Introduction