On Bended Knee
On Bended Knee
I am not a football fan, but my interest was aroused by Trump’s
flare-up over the national anthem non-issue amidst a hurricane disaster in
Puerto Rico, a more than likely US repudiation of the nuclear agreement of Iran,
an intensifying war prospect with North Korea, and a contentious senatorial
debate on the latest effort to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act.
Prior to Trump’s self-serving outburst, I knew that Colin Kaepernick took to
the posture of kneeling in playing of the national anthem in protest of mostly black
males unjustly shot and killed by mainly white police officers, with rare
exception, without legal consequences. After the president’s, difficult to
miss, vulgarly obscene, racially inspired dog whistle in the heartland of Old
Dixie, I learned that Kaepernick is a seriously committed Christian who has
used his influence and donated his time and money for a variety important
causes within the US and abroad, including a $50,000 donation to Meals on
Wheels.
For all the kerfuffle of allegedly desecrating a potent
national symbol, Kaepernick’s protest needs to be viewed within the specific context
of the Civil Rights inspired African American tradition of non-violent
resistance to the social evil of endemic racism—a symbolic act with historical
echoes extending back to Rosa Parks’ refusal to give up her seat on a
segregated Montgomery bus some 60 years ago.
It is within this framework that Kaepernick’s bended knee represents, in
Mr. K’s words, a powerful protest against “a country that [continues] to
oppress black people and people of color” 150 years after the abolition of
slavery and 50 years after the Civil Rights Movement—a protest that for him
draws on the Christian imagery of the Sermon on the Mount symbolized in the very
posture he has taken to express his sorrow: “Blessed are those who are
persecuted for righteousness sake, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven” (Matt
5:10). As did MLK Jr. in his symbolic
rhetoric, Kaepernick, by his symbolic action, echoed the call of his savior to
“heal the broken hearted” and to “proclaim liberty to the captives” in order to
“set at liberty those who are oppressed” (Luke 4:18).
As a Caucasian, I lack the experiential capacity to fully enter
the depth of that which Kaepernick channeled: the profound suffering and
injustice that the African American community has endured in this land for
almost 400 years. Still, I know enough about history, politics and culture and possess
sufficient personal awareness to grasp something of how the recent killings of mostly
black males by mainly white police officers evoke a long legacy of fear, sorrow,
outrage, and the call for solidarity among both the African American community
and others of all races who desire to join with them in their struggle for an ever
elusive, always aspirational equality, which, at its best, speaks to this
nation’s better angels.
In the words of the Jewish prophet, “justice [has not yet]
run down like water. Righteousness [does
not yet flow] like a mighty stream” (Amos, 5:24) for the African American
community in this great land in our times. With the recent killings of black
youth and adults by police officers and the pernicious Shelby County vs Holder
Supreme Court case, which gutted two key sections of the Voting Right Act of
1965, it is easy to draw the more than reasonable conclusion that justice has
moved backward in recent times from the high-water mark of the Civil Rights
Movement of the 1960s. In the light of this more recent history, processed
through the cumulative impact of two centuries of slavery, a century of Jim
Crow segregationist laws in the South, and a long history of de facto
segregation in housing and employment in the North, one can begin to appreciate
Kaepernick’s principled protest—even more so given the persistent, subtler
forms of racism characteristic of much of this nation’s political culture.
The Preamble to the Constitution calls upon the people of
this great land to form “a more perfect union,” clearly, an aspirational goal
that seems closer to realization among certain groups of people than others.
This more perfect union will not be secured until the “blessings of liberty”
are obtained for all people, including the most oppressed in our society.
One may take a stance toward the national anthem different
from Kaepernick’s and even disagree with his principled position, but to
dispute his right to take it is to violate this nation’s highest values in
quest of freedom and liberty for all. Rather
than mandating a spurious patriotism by requiring all to stand at reverent
attention to the Star-Spangled Banner, how preferable it would be if our
President encouraged us to collectively work toward that more perfect union as
an ongoing project of national identity fulfillment. In that day—one that always calls us to our
better selves—it could then be said that America fulfills its national
destiny—one rooted in the inspiring imagery of our nation’s founding documents,
one that Lincoln—however imperfectly—brought to life in his generation, one
which calls upon us to enact in ours. I
believe Mr. Kaepernick’s principled protest, which has cost him much, is deeply
rooted in this patriotic aspiration.
2017
Comments
Post a Comment